Another variation on how to write a sentence..
Lukes (February 2020) discusses of how to actually write a sentence. As I have been attempting to progress my skill in writing, I am taking more time analysing what I am reading to recognise patterns. First, there seems to be chronological approach to link to previous works, quotes, and conclusion. Next, giving another example, with another conclusion.
This example is simplier than academic papers due to its use of words, however, it doesnt follow the lpeec approach within a paragraph. The lpeec approach helps me understand easily where one idea starts and stops. When the lpeec pattern is spread across many paragraphs, or doesnt follow the lpeec pattern, I get confused.
The introduction mentions the problem, and instead of signposting within a paragraph, a table of contents is presented, is this a normal approach?
From the table of contents I am trying to recognise the macro writing patterns, 1) defintion, 2) problems during writing, 3) after writing concerns, 4) how to write a sentence , and finally, 5) conclusions. I found classifying these concepts quite hard; to know how one section relates to another, the idea that the headings are still chronological in order.
After I analysed the patterns, it is only then I can start to attempt to read, that again takes many times. I view this article as a checklist, as initially to an untrained writer I cannot deliver content that conforms to all these rules.
After attempting to apply some editing, it leaves me with a realisation as experienced by the hero within any horror movie that expects a sequel: my work has only just begun. I need to reframe to keep improving
Is this work balanced enough? what could I do better?
Thanks
Phil
This example is simplier than academic papers due to its use of words, however, it doesnt follow the lpeec approach within a paragraph. The lpeec approach helps me understand easily where one idea starts and stops. When the lpeec pattern is spread across many paragraphs, or doesnt follow the lpeec pattern, I get confused.
The introduction mentions the problem, and instead of signposting within a paragraph, a table of contents is presented, is this a normal approach?
From the table of contents I am trying to recognise the macro writing patterns, 1) defintion, 2) problems during writing, 3) after writing concerns, 4) how to write a sentence , and finally, 5) conclusions. I found classifying these concepts quite hard; to know how one section relates to another, the idea that the headings are still chronological in order.
After I analysed the patterns, it is only then I can start to attempt to read, that again takes many times. I view this article as a checklist, as initially to an untrained writer I cannot deliver content that conforms to all these rules.
After attempting to apply some editing, it leaves me with a realisation as experienced by the hero within any horror movie that expects a sequel: my work has only just begun. I need to reframe to keep improving
Is this work balanced enough? what could I do better?
Thanks
Phil
Comments
Post a Comment